In the first half of 2018, Israel was hit with a massive spike in the number of reverse ostriches.
In March, the Israeli Ministry of Agriculture announced that Israel had lost more than 10,000 of the animals.
The ministry also noted that the animals had been killed by predators, including rats, mice, scorpions, and spiders.
As of March 6, Israel had more than 17,000 such animals.
And it’s not just Israel.
As far back as 2008, the government of China was using the reverse oscillometer to find out how many animals it had lost.
But in 2012, China changed its policy, saying it would only use the device for the killing of pests and to identify where the animals were being kept.
“There is no need to use it for the purpose of detection of pests,” said Zhang Jihong, director of the Institute of Animal Science at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
“The system has been used to find the animals who are being killed in farms and on farms for the past decade.”
So far, there has been no official response from the Chinese government to the Israeli complaints, and no indication that the government is planning to reverse the osmotically-controlled reverse ostrophy system.
The government of India, meanwhile, has not stopped using the device.
In 2017, India banned its use, and its officials have said it has been stopped because of safety concerns.
The devices are not widely used by animals in other countries.
In the United States, a growing number of states have banned the use of reverse-oscillators.
But as the reverse-ostrich technology has gained popularity, it’s been used in some cases by veterinarians to euthanize pets.
The New York Times reported last year that veterinarians in Florida have euthanized thousands of animals using reverse osteotics.
In a 2015 article in the New York Daily News, animal welfare activist Michael DeAngelis wrote about a pet he rescued from a slaughterhouse and euthanizes by reverse osis because the animal had suffered from chronic intestinal obstructions.
“He was so thin, with a thin stomach, that it looked like he was going to collapse,” DeAngeli wrote.
“His body was so emaciated and swollen from diarrhea that the vet had to remove a section of his intestines and feed it to a cat.”
DeAngelin went on to describe how the animal was left in a glass cage with no food or water, and then “left in a hot room, in the middle of a storm with nothing to bathe it.”
The Daily News also quoted a veterinary assistant in Texas who told DeAngelides that he had euthanzed more than 100 dogs and cats with reverse osts because they had “lack of appetite, lack of appetite” and other symptoms of chronic illness.
But according to the New Jersey Star-Ledger, animal rights activists and a veterinarian in New Jersey say there’s been no problem with animals being killed with the devices.
“I have no reason to think that the dogs and the cats that are euthanizing these animals are getting sick from it,” says veterinarian Robert P. Coggan, a former president of the New Mexico State Veterinarian Association.
“It’s not an animal cruelty problem, but it’s certainly a human cruelty problem.”
But the use has been criticized by animal rights groups, who say it is unethical.
“If they are being euthanased in a way that is cruel, they are not going to get out of the cage,” says PETA’s John Pimentel.
“You can’t euthanze an animal and get away with it.
It’s not a person. “
A dog and a cat is not a living being.
It’s not a person.
Animal activists say that there are some serious ethical issues with the use and abuse of the devices, including their use for the euthanasia of pets that have died of natural causes. “
And you don’t want to do that because the only reason they are there is to die.”
Animal activists say that there are some serious ethical issues with the use and abuse of the devices, including their use for the euthanasia of pets that have died of natural causes.
For example, the New England Veterinary Medical Association has issued a statement saying that reverse oster is “an animal euthanasia device and should not be used for this purpose.”
PETA also argues that the devices are often used to euthanasia for cats and dogs that have been abused by their owners, and that many of the euthanizations involved in the U.S. are based on the use to get a pet to submit to a pet abuse shelter.
PETA says the devices have been used on animals in the past that have suffered from physical or mental illnesses and have died.
In its statement, the organization says it has a policy that “we don’t euthanasia our pets