Solar System|lupus Systems Tutorial When the camera system that can read your face turns into a surveillance tool

When the camera system that can read your face turns into a surveillance tool

Texas is in the midst of a public relations disaster.

After years of complaints about the camera systems used to scan license plates and other driver data, lawmakers in the Lone Star State have finally been able to get some answers about how they work.

The state’s legislature passed a bill in March that would allow a company to use a device called the EyeCam to scan the face of drivers on the road.

In theory, it would make it easier for people to make a claim of a collision and, if necessary, a lawsuit against the drivers.

A federal judge has yet to rule on whether Texas’ system is constitutional, though Texas’ law is so broadly worded that it is likely unconstitutional.

In the meantime, the system has been used in Texas for a decade, even before Texas legislators passed the bill, but it has never been widely used by drivers.

The Texas Department of Transportation says the EyeCams are being used by more than 50,000 drivers each day.

The department also says the company, called TXLight, is licensed to use its technology to scan Texas drivers’ license plates.

Texas Department Of Transportation spokesman Chris Jones told VICE News that the EyeCamera was originally designed for license plate readers.

In some cases, Texas is able to track the location of a vehicle and its license plate number with a device known as an ETCV.

In other cases, however, Texas has to rely on a technology known as a fingerprint reader to access license plate information.

In 2016, Texas passed a law requiring the Eye Cameras be removed from the roads.

But the Texas Department is now considering whether to continue using the technology to track license plates, according to a report in the Austin American-Statesman.

The EyeCam has already been used by the Texas Rangers, which can use it to help locate suspects who might have been involved in a crime.

The Austin Police Department has also used it to locate people who have been shot at, according the report.

The law that Texas is currently considering requires Texas to make the Eye Cam mandatory, but the department is also considering installing a new system that will allow drivers to opt out of the system entirely.

Texas has never required a license plate reader to be on the roads, but since the Texas Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that license plate scanners were unconstitutional, the department has been working to get a license plates reader on the streets.

Under that ruling, the state’s license plate cameras were limited to issuing a license or registration card to each license plate owner.

A 2016 Supreme Court ruling said that the law limiting the number of license plate camera cameras was unconstitutional because it did not give license plate owners a right to opt-out of being scanned.

It is unclear whether Texas will be able to secure the Eye Camera until the Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the Texas law.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who represents Texas, told the Texas Tribune last week that he expects the Supreme court to rule soon.

Paxton said in the Tribune that he was confident the Supreme, which will be deciding whether to hear the case in March, would overturn the 2015 decision.

But he also pointed to the fact that Texas has had license plate scanner technology in place for years, as well as other systems that are not subject to the same federal privacy protections.

Paeson’s office declined to comment to VICE News.

The Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division has been conducting an investigation into the state of Texas’ license plate scanning system, which is run by the Austin Police Dept.

The Justice Department is investigating whether the system is unconstitutional and whether any state laws violate the Americans With Disabilities Act.

A spokesperson for the Texas attorney general did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Texas is not alone in the U.S. in its fight with the federal government over driver data collection.

Last year, California’s legislature created a Privacy Shield, a system of laws that protects privacy rights for people who use technology like cellphones to store information on their devices.

The system is designed to protect the privacy of individuals who use such technology from lawsuits and privacy violations.

In February, the Texas state senate passed a similar bill that would create a Privacy Protections Shield, but that bill died in the House after a single Republican voted against it.

The privacy concerns about the Texas system come at a time when some states have been trying to improve their privacy laws.

California passed a state-wide privacy bill in January that would require drivers to give up their personal information in exchange for a one-time payment of $200.

That payment would not be available to drivers who are suspected of a crime, a crime that is not necessarily related to their personal data, but rather to a criminal investigation.

The bill was criticized for not providing drivers with a choice between giving up their information and not giving up any information at all.

The California law was passed by a Republican-controlled state legislature and was expected to pass through the Republican